Defiant Imagination

Archive
Author Archive

Portland, sustainable capital of North America – Part 2

Naomi Cole manages the EcoDistricts initiative with the Portland Sustainability Institute. The nonprofit will work in five districts over the next few years to lower carbon emissions, improve energy efficiency, and engage residents to develop vibrant and sustainable communities.

How did the idea of EcoDistricts come about?

Portland has been building green buildings really well for the last 10 years, but there’s another level after that. You have even more opportunities with green buildings that are connected with water sharing, air conditioning and other energy efficiency features.
Our strategy is based on five pilot districts. All five of the districts are urban renewal areas and they have very different typologies. We have the [Portland State] University, we have a neighbourhood called the Lloyd district and that’s primarily commercial properties, the South Waterfront, which has seen significant development in the last ten years. The last two are called Gateway and Lents. They are primarily residential, lower-income. We have done the least work to date out there.
The stake-holders in the districts are going to have very different relationships. The challenges around how you make decisions will be very different.

Read more…

Portland, sustainable capital of North America

This is an interview I did with Michael Armstrong, senior sustainability manager for the city of Portland.

The city of Portland has taken a number of groundbreaking measures over the years to increase its sustainability. How do you get the support from the public to enact such measures?

Michael Armstrong: A big part of what we do about setting a vision is setting public engagement. We do that through surveys and public workshops attended by the mayor, and we’ve also been working in small groups. We learn a lot from this, and people understand how things work city-wide.

There’s a long tradition of that here. There is this well-established institutional culture and citizen engagement. We sort of joke about this, some people say “do we really have to get people’s opinion on this issue?” Well in Portland, we do. In Portland people care and that’s how they understand the outcomes. People who have less interest in what the municipal government is doing are less likely to move to Portland than, say, Houston.

Read more…

What bee crisis?

Flickr user Tie Guy II

Today I’d like to go back over this Guardian article I tweeted about last week, which brings a new perspective on the bee crisis.

You’ve probably heard of the Colony Collapse Disorder, this phenomenon that has been affecting beehives across North America for the past few years, causing the disappearance of millions of bees. The seriousness of the crisis has been underlined by scientists. Indeed, what would become of our crops if we couldn’t rely on these pollinators? Should we expect a major food crisis?

Flickr user Tie Guy II

Author Nathanael Johnson, however, asks another question: how does this issue fit into the big picture? And comes up with this subsersive answer: the crisis might not be where we thought.

Read more…

Meat is back, part 2

Flickr user misterjamin

This is the second part of my two-part series on meat. This post is not intended to criticize vegetarianism or veganism, but rather to analyze a trend that has been developing in North America.

DIY butchering

Flickr user misterjamin

Why limit yourself to the supermarket or the butcher shop to get your meat? A number of communities around the country have taken the CSA model (Community Supported Agriculture) to a new level, allowing its members to team up and buy meat directly from the farmers. In Berkeley, CA, the local Slow Food chapter has turned its meat CSA into a social networking platform where communication between neighbours is facilitated in order to better manage orders.

Read more…

Meat is back, Part 1

Smoked reindeer heart

Meat is back. Of course, it never totally went away. Montrealers still lined up in front of Schwartz’s deli, even in the coldest temperatures, Oprah still indulged on Seattle’s Ezell chicken, and the kitchen still smelled of bacon every Sunday at brunch time. But meat had become a guilty pleasure. By eating it, we were condoning animal cruelty, climate change, food poisoning and chronic health problems exposed and vilified by years of vegetarian activism and investigative journalism. A bunch of smart-ass chefs, butchers and other food-lovers are changing all that by bringing the ethics and pride back to animal foods.

There has been a bit of controversy in the food scene here in Seattle, where I’m writing from. A couple of weeks ago, The Stranger, a local alternative weekly, published a severely critical piece about Bill the Butcher, a beloved local store chain specialized in organic and local meats. The stores aren’t as transparent as they claim, the article argues, and some of the meat isn’t really organic.
Bill, the owner, defends himself. The chain never pretended to be 100% organic, he says, and it doesn’t mean its products don’t meet high standards. “It takes a substantial investment and a period of years to get an organic certification and many local farmers and ranchers just cannot afford to pursue this,” reads an open letter published on the chain’s website.

This is just another episode in the meat saga that is well under way on North America’s West Coast. As the organic and locavore movements grow in popularity, so does the demand for meat coming from animals that have been raised ethically, fed with grass, and slaughtered in decent conditions – all within a reasonable distance. For those who could never bring themselves to vegetarianism, this is salvation. They can eat meat while keeping their conscience intact.

Read more…

Understanding slums and squatter cities

Each day, about 200,000 people around the world move from the country to the city in search of better opportunities. This means two things: the end of the dominance of western metropolises in favour of third-world cities, and the growth of informal and illegal neighbourhoods commonly referred to as slums or squatter cities. This is what tomorrow’s world will be like.
About one billion people currently live in slums around the world. Current estimations predict this number will grow to two billion by 2030. Although slums have traditionnally been negatively portrayed, their role has been instrumental in urban, economic and social development of societies. I’ve chosen to present the three personalities whose work has transformed our vision of the current urbanization movement.

The idealist

Steve Brand is better known as the co-founder of the Long Now Foundation and the Global Business Network. His controversial ideas about environmentalism have been summed up in the book Whole Earth Discipline.
Brand sees contemporary slums as a means to limit population growth and provide opportunities to million of residents in developing countries. His short TED talk sums up why we should care:

Brand sees a huge potential in turning slums into sustainable neighbourhoods. Slums are already “green” because of their high density of population. Urban farms, green roofs, solar panels and mass transit systems could be implanted in order to make these communities self-sufficient.

Read Brand’s article in Prospect magazine here.

The pragmatist

Journalist Robert Neuwirth has been witnessing life in slums first-hand by spending several years living in various squatter cities around the world. He is the author of the book Shadow Cities: A Billion Squatters, A New Urban World and of the blog Squatter Cities.
Where some see poverty, Neuwirth sees neighbouroods that can be extremely vibrant, rapidly developing, home to intricate social networks and business opportunities. He notes that some of them are naturally evolving toward better standards of living, to the point where they become similar to any other neighbourhood. Neuwirth sees two conditions to this: the ability of residents to avoid eviction and remain on the land, and access to politics.
“The issue is not urban poverty,” he said as a conclusion to his 2005 TED Talk. “The issue is for us to recognize that these are neighbourhoods, this is a legitimate form of urban development.”
Neuwirth has been critical of the United Nations, whose Settlements Programme, also known as U.N. Habitat, has been ineffective. Its world headquarters are ironically located near Kibera in Nairobi, Kenya, one of the poorest slums.

Here is his PopTech! talk, slightly more informational than the TED one:

The theorist

Mike Davis’s Planet of Slums has been written from the comfort of his home. An urban theorist, historian, and political activist, Davis’s work is mostly theoretical and seeks to analyze slums from a global, historical and political perspective.
Davis notes the interest of the American military in studying slums. Modern warfare, having shifted toward urban guerillas, needs to understand the functioning of slums and capitalize on it.
He also underlines the rise of religious movements in slums, notably Pentecostalism and its importance in Latin America and Africa. “The largest self-organized movement of poor urban people in the world” according to Davis, Pentecostalism is responsible  for many social behaviours in squatter cities.
According to him, slums have been seeing a rise in political  and social movements within their limits. However he doesn’t believe in formal political institutions as a way for slums to access better living conditions, in large part because of corruption.
Davis’s work has often been described as “anti-urban” and “apocalyptic.” He has been rebuked for failing to see the potential of slums as sustainable communities.

Read Davis’s interview with BLDGBLOG.

Social networking for gardeners: the landsharing movement

This post was long overdue. I first heard about sharing backyards initiatives last year while reporting on the rise of urban agriculture. Since then, these initiatives have flourished and others have been created.

A community garden in St-Louis

Many North American city dwellers have the advantage of having a backyard adjacent to their house, and have been increasingly aware of the potential they have for food production. Gardening can be quite time-consuming though, and many of us aren’t ready to get our hands dirty. The solution: letting another garden-lover come over and take care of it all during the season, and pay him back in food or cash. The remaining produce should cover the expenses.

As usual in the post-internet world, garden owners and would-be workers can find each other online. SharedEarth offers a worldwide matching service listings and an interactive map. Most users are located in the U.S., but its fanbase is already slowly growing. Sharing Backyards, another online platform, is strongly rooted in Canada and the U.S.

At the local level, BK Farmyards takes care of Brooklyn gardens, while Urban Garden Share operates in Seattle.

Landsharing brings more to its adepts than food only. Through sharing, neighbourhood residents can reconnect and contribute to building vibrant communities. As summed up on BK Farmyards’ website:

The rituals of preparing and eating meals are the foundation of culture: it is how we celebrate the gift of life, and how trust is established in a community. BK Farmyard provides local jobs, local economic growth, and a sense of stewardship and pride in the community: it educates, organizes, and mobilizes new social relations around food.

But it’s not only about vegetables. Calgary resident Eliese Watson runs Apiaries and Bees for Communities, a business through which she tends to bee hives located in several gardens. In exchange, garden owers get their share of honey.

Neo-education: the revolution of learning

“The first month of watching TED talks online gave me more knowledge, insight, and inspiration than all four years of the glorified status symbol that is Ivy League education,” writes Brain Pickings editor and TED addict Maria Popova in Good magazine’s Slow Issue. Popova goes on describing how neo-education (free education available on demand through online platforms) achieves what traditional education increasingly fails to do — satisfy our curiosity and provide us with endless knowledge.

I can certainly relate to that. Six years of academia gave me the many skills I need to be a social critic and journalist: observe, analyze, criticize, and produce meaningful content. As for knowledge, I’ve already forgotten most of it, to my greatest dismay. Academia, as far as the Liberal arts are concerned, is shaped on a model that is not valid anymore. Its raison d’être is not to give us knowledge but to train researchers — which few of us actually become.

The TED commandments.

The Internet gives me access to an infinite pool of knowledge. TED talks and podcasts (I learned so much through Radio Lab) are a blessing. Their skillful use of storytelling makes it easier for me to get interested and retain information. This might be why storytelling is making a big comeback (local versions of The Moth are popping up everywhere across the continent.) We’re craving for stories, for information that isn’t delivered in a dull and uninteresting way and elicits a whole range of emotions. We’re also craving for a more human way of transmitting knowledge, and going back to the oral tradition.

Social media has also transformed my learning. Through Twitter, I have access to the best thinkers and researchers in my field. I religiously read and ponder over Jay Rosen’s tweets. I have access to his ideas not only for free (no need to buy a book or pay for NYU tuition fees) but also in real time. The discussion and debate also take place instantly. This open, participative thinking process has the potential to revolutionize the world of academia.

Are we going toward a democratization of knowledge?

This man is dangerous.

Finding the right city

As part of my research on cities and personality, I’ve just finished perusing Richard Florida’s Who’s Your City. Florida says we should look at different factors when searching for the right city to move in. One of them is personality.

This shouldn’t be a secret to anybody that certain cities offer different types of stimulation. For instance, the American coasts are reknown for being creative hubs. One can feel stimulated by the amount of art galleries and other cultural offerings, and the general atmosphere that encourages residents to create, launch their own companies, go to the museum, etc. In return, these residents will contribute to solidify this environment, which in turn will attract more creative people, etc.

Florida argues that, because of this cycle, American cities end up having a personality of their own. After doing some extensive research, he’s found that their personality pretty much matches the Big Five personality traits usually applied to people: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, neuroticism. Therefore when we move to a new place, we should be aware not only of our own personality type, but also of the city’s personality. (To determine your personality type, you can do this online test: http://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/)

The Big Five model has been criticized and rightfully so; it is difficult to put personalities into categories and draw conclusions from that. Yet I do think this was a useful tool for this study. The maps that Florida created are shockingly compelling!

Here’s what Florida says of people belonging to the openness category and what it means for cities:

Certain personality types seem to require higher and more intense levels of stimulation – both literally and figuratively. They are drawn to extreme experience – complex music, intense tastes, exciting places, and eccentric people. It’s not by chance that people with these qualities happen to cluster in highly stimulating places, I thought. They are inclined, if not programmed, to seek them out.

Openness to experience is the only personality type that plays a consistent role in regional economic development. It is highly correlated with jobs in computing, science, arts, design, and entertainment; with overall human capital levels, high-tech industry, income, and housing values.

Unfortunately, this research has been done for the U.S. only and no data is available for Canadian cities. But I think that in order to progress, I would have to determine:

  • Vancouver’s personality type
  • The flourishing industries in the region: do they belong to the creative industry?
  • What can we fear for the city if the film industry, the video games industry and the fine arts are threatened?
  • Why do so many young people leave Vancouver, and what personality types are they? Who are the personality types who choose to stay?

On top of being a fascinating read, Florida’s book made me realize so many things about myself. A lot of times I felt he was talking about me! This has led me to think about who I am and what I need to evolve as a person.

Let me know if you think of other areas I should explore based on Florida’s work. As usual, suggestions and comments are very welcome!

Vancouver, who are you? Credits: Flickr user s.yume. The caption for this picture reads: "A beautiful view of beautiful Vancouver BC from the seawall in Stanley Park. Vancouver is an amazingly idyllic place to be, beautiful all year round. How many times have I said beautiful? It really is my favorite city on Earth, I can't think of any place I'd rather live."

Cities, happiness and personality: a research manifesto

Dear readers,

I really tried to love Vancouver. I will not spend a great deal of time trying to convince you that I did, but I really did. The fact is, five months after moving here, I’m a shadow of my old self. I will not spend a great deal of time trying to explain to you what happened, all you need to know is that the city had a pretty hard way of showing me our personalities don’t match. I can’t wait to get the hell out.

I hold Vancouver personnally responsible for all of this. You see, I’m an over-confident, stubborn twentysomething French girl. I refuse to believe that one can go in a few months from “hyper-active young graduate about to conquer the world” to “I feel like I’m dying inside.” Especially when each time you leave the city, be it for one day, you suddenly get all jumpy and annoyingly energetic again.

I know this sounds weird, but think about it for a minute. If you’re Canadian, you know that anyone who’s spent some time in Vancouver either loves it or hates it. Loves it like “I’ve visited 30 countries and I wouldn’t live anywhere else,” hates it like “this place has no soul and is truly depressing.” Actually, Canadians have pretty strong feelings about every major city in the country. “Toronto totally sucks.” “Montreal is just sooooo awesooome.” There doesn’t seem to be any middle ground.

Now the people who hate Vancouver usually have a hard time explaining why it is so. Of course there’s the rain, lack of cultural events and nightlife, unappealing architecture, etc. But then they always end up adding something like “there’s just something to it.” Or, “it’s the vibe, I don’t dig it.” And eventually they conclude with “I don’t know what it is, but it’s just depressing.”

I’ve been trying to convince myself that maaaaybe the summer will reveal the city’s hidden treasures, feeling guilty to not be content with what I have. But the truth is, my mind was made up after a few days only. I remember the first time I walked on Commercial Drive. It didn’t take long before I thought “I don’t know what it is, but this street has something weird to it.” I didn’t feel comfortable at all. Nowhere in the city did I have the same sense of wonderment that Montreal elicited in me.

Where did that feeling come from? What is that “thing” about Vancouver that nobody seems to be able to explain? What happens in the brief moment during which we discover a new place that makes us decide whether we’re comfortable or not? I won’t take “gut feeling” for an answer. I shall discover what happens in our brain when we visit a city for the first time, how cities and places can affect our personality, and why we love or hate our cities so passionately. This will be an exciting trip into the fields of environmental psychology, urban sociology, psychogeography and more.

I’ve also decided to regularly give an account of the state of my research in this blog. Posts will be classified in the category “research.” You are encouraged to participate by submitting your ideas and hypotheses as well as by giving your opinion and advice.

Wish me well!

Flavie