Defiant Imagination

Archive
Urbanism and architecture

Understanding slums and squatter cities

Each day, about 200,000 people around the world move from the country to the city in search of better opportunities. This means two things: the end of the dominance of western metropolises in favour of third-world cities, and the growth of informal and illegal neighbourhoods commonly referred to as slums or squatter cities. This is what tomorrow’s world will be like.
About one billion people currently live in slums around the world. Current estimations predict this number will grow to two billion by 2030. Although slums have traditionnally been negatively portrayed, their role has been instrumental in urban, economic and social development of societies. I’ve chosen to present the three personalities whose work has transformed our vision of the current urbanization movement.

The idealist

Steve Brand is better known as the co-founder of the Long Now Foundation and the Global Business Network. His controversial ideas about environmentalism have been summed up in the book Whole Earth Discipline.
Brand sees contemporary slums as a means to limit population growth and provide opportunities to million of residents in developing countries. His short TED talk sums up why we should care:

Brand sees a huge potential in turning slums into sustainable neighbourhoods. Slums are already “green” because of their high density of population. Urban farms, green roofs, solar panels and mass transit systems could be implanted in order to make these communities self-sufficient.

Read Brand’s article in Prospect magazine here.

The pragmatist

Journalist Robert Neuwirth has been witnessing life in slums first-hand by spending several years living in various squatter cities around the world. He is the author of the book Shadow Cities: A Billion Squatters, A New Urban World and of the blog Squatter Cities.
Where some see poverty, Neuwirth sees neighbouroods that can be extremely vibrant, rapidly developing, home to intricate social networks and business opportunities. He notes that some of them are naturally evolving toward better standards of living, to the point where they become similar to any other neighbourhood. Neuwirth sees two conditions to this: the ability of residents to avoid eviction and remain on the land, and access to politics.
“The issue is not urban poverty,” he said as a conclusion to his 2005 TED Talk. “The issue is for us to recognize that these are neighbourhoods, this is a legitimate form of urban development.”
Neuwirth has been critical of the United Nations, whose Settlements Programme, also known as U.N. Habitat, has been ineffective. Its world headquarters are ironically located near Kibera in Nairobi, Kenya, one of the poorest slums.

Here is his PopTech! talk, slightly more informational than the TED one:

The theorist

Mike Davis’s Planet of Slums has been written from the comfort of his home. An urban theorist, historian, and political activist, Davis’s work is mostly theoretical and seeks to analyze slums from a global, historical and political perspective.
Davis notes the interest of the American military in studying slums. Modern warfare, having shifted toward urban guerillas, needs to understand the functioning of slums and capitalize on it.
He also underlines the rise of religious movements in slums, notably Pentecostalism and its importance in Latin America and Africa. “The largest self-organized movement of poor urban people in the world” according to Davis, Pentecostalism is responsible  for many social behaviours in squatter cities.
According to him, slums have been seeing a rise in political  and social movements within their limits. However he doesn’t believe in formal political institutions as a way for slums to access better living conditions, in large part because of corruption.
Davis’s work has often been described as “anti-urban” and “apocalyptic.” He has been rebuked for failing to see the potential of slums as sustainable communities.

Read Davis’s interview with BLDGBLOG.

Cities, happiness and personality: a research manifesto

Dear readers,

I really tried to love Vancouver. I will not spend a great deal of time trying to convince you that I did, but I really did. The fact is, five months after moving here, I’m a shadow of my old self. I will not spend a great deal of time trying to explain to you what happened, all you need to know is that the city had a pretty hard way of showing me our personalities don’t match. I can’t wait to get the hell out.

I hold Vancouver personnally responsible for all of this. You see, I’m an over-confident, stubborn twentysomething French girl. I refuse to believe that one can go in a few months from “hyper-active young graduate about to conquer the world” to “I feel like I’m dying inside.” Especially when each time you leave the city, be it for one day, you suddenly get all jumpy and annoyingly energetic again.

I know this sounds weird, but think about it for a minute. If you’re Canadian, you know that anyone who’s spent some time in Vancouver either loves it or hates it. Loves it like “I’ve visited 30 countries and I wouldn’t live anywhere else,” hates it like “this place has no soul and is truly depressing.” Actually, Canadians have pretty strong feelings about every major city in the country. “Toronto totally sucks.” “Montreal is just sooooo awesooome.” There doesn’t seem to be any middle ground.

Now the people who hate Vancouver usually have a hard time explaining why it is so. Of course there’s the rain, lack of cultural events and nightlife, unappealing architecture, etc. But then they always end up adding something like “there’s just something to it.” Or, “it’s the vibe, I don’t dig it.” And eventually they conclude with “I don’t know what it is, but it’s just depressing.”

I’ve been trying to convince myself that maaaaybe the summer will reveal the city’s hidden treasures, feeling guilty to not be content with what I have. But the truth is, my mind was made up after a few days only. I remember the first time I walked on Commercial Drive. It didn’t take long before I thought “I don’t know what it is, but this street has something weird to it.” I didn’t feel comfortable at all. Nowhere in the city did I have the same sense of wonderment that Montreal elicited in me.

Where did that feeling come from? What is that “thing” about Vancouver that nobody seems to be able to explain? What happens in the brief moment during which we discover a new place that makes us decide whether we’re comfortable or not? I won’t take “gut feeling” for an answer. I shall discover what happens in our brain when we visit a city for the first time, how cities and places can affect our personality, and why we love or hate our cities so passionately. This will be an exciting trip into the fields of environmental psychology, urban sociology, psychogeography and more.

I’ve also decided to regularly give an account of the state of my research in this blog. Posts will be classified in the category “research.” You are encouraged to participate by submitting your ideas and hypotheses as well as by giving your opinion and advice.

Wish me well!

Flavie

Urban revitalization: when retail giants lead the way

Please excuse me for the lack of posts in the last few weeks. I’ve been busy preparing my move to Vancouver and slowly adjusting to my new life here. I hope to be able to write about all the good stuff happening in the city and hopefully visit other west coast cities such as Portland and Seattle.

This week, I’ve been looking at how chain stores can participate in urban revitalization. While doing some research for an article, I stumbled upon this 2005 Seattle Times article. American Apparel had just opened its first Seattle store in an area that was trying to take on a new lease of life, and hoped their presence would attract other boutiques. The article described their strategy:

While scouting locations for American Apparel stores, Webb looks for signs that speak to a hippay sensibility. Literal signs, such as “Loft Available” or “Vegetarian Restaurant.”

In a few instances, American Apparel is an active player in bringing other retailers to a street, leasing more space than it needs and subletting to those that cater to the same demographic.

In Houston, a city of malls, American Apparel opted to open downtown, where fashion boutiques do not exist, and is negotiating for a location in downtown San Jose, Calif. Yes, San Jose has a downtown.

And in Portland, American Apparel opened a store 18 months ago among boarded-up buildings on Southwest Stark Street instead of in the nearby Pearl District, where trendy redevelopment already had taken hold.

(By the way, did anybody stick with the term “hippay”?)

I never thought of urban revitalization as a conscious process, especially not operated by retail giants. Most of the time, revitalization happens progressively when store owners and artists look for cheap retail spaces and studios. But I incidentally found a similar example of this.

Lara Swimmer

Urban Outfitters

Urban Outfitter’s new headquarters are housed in a huge five-building, 11-acre campus located in the Philadelphia Navy Yard. The building houses offices for the company’s different brands (Urban Outfitters, Free People, Anthropologie and Terrain) as well as employee services: a cafeteria, a coffee bar, a library and a fitness centre. The clothing and houseware company undertook the redevelopment of this former shipbuilding complex in 2004. The revamped buidings are a wonderful example of adaptation of turn-of-the-century industrial archictecture to contemporary purposes.

This great article from Metropolis magazine sums up pretty well the change this represented for the company:

The idea of yanking more than 600 of Philadelphia’s most creative—not to mention best-dressed —workers out of downtown was the equivalent of exiling Manhattan’s Seventh Avenue fashion houses to an industrial park near JFK. Losing so many trendsetters would surely diminish the Center City District’s hard-won cool quotient. Meanwhile all those hipsters in skinny jeans and vintage boots would have to figure out how to get to a compound so far off the city grid it was practically tumbling into the Delaware River. There wasn’t a coffeehouse or magazine stand in sight.

Other businesses have since relocated to the Navy Yard, creating more than 4,000 jobs and participating in the rebirth of South Philadelphia.

See more pictures on Decor8′s Flickr photostream.

Charter cities: using urbanization to boost development

Economist Paul Romer has an interesting take on getting third-world countries out of poverty. His idea: to build “charter cities” operated under an independent jurisdiction, just like Hong Kong used to be. Think Canada taking over Guantánamo Bay for a while to oversee its development. Romer’s plan might be ambitious and extravagant, but it has nonetheless been generating a great deal of interest.

Read a Q&A with Romer on the New York Times’ Freakonomics blog.

Visit the project’s website.

Watch Romer’s TED talk:

From red light to green living

Pittsburgh is currently in the spotlight for hosting the G20 summit, and the changes it has undergone in the past years are finally getting some visibility. The steel city has abandoned its industrial past and embraced a diversified economy. But what drew my attention was a mention about its urban redevelopment in The Economist.

The David L. Lawrence Convention Center is, according to the article, the world’s first and largest LEED-certified convention centre. It is located in an area that used to be filled with sex shops, adult theatres and prostitutes. The centre is part of the Pittsburgh Cultural District, a redevelopment effort that seeks to transform this so-called redlight district into a cultural hub. The district also includes several theatres and cultural centres as well as the High School for Creative and Performing Arts.

The Agnes R. Katz Plaza. Photo courtesy of the Pittsburgh Cultural Trust.

Pittsburgh's Agnes R. Katz Plaza. Photo courtesy of the Pittsburgh Cultural Trust.

“The Cultural District today attracts over 2,000,000 visitors annually generating an estimated economic impact of $303 million,” boasts its website.

Pittsburgh is not the only city having gone through the effort of getting rid of its embarrassing debauchery-oriented areas. Amsterdam’s legendary red-light district is opening its prostitute booths to local designers. Montreal, where I currently live, has recently tackled on the e of its own “Red Light.” Located at a major intersection close to downtown, the area will be home to green buildings and cultural organizations.

Montreal's historical Café Cléopâtre. Flickr user thehoneybunny, held under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

Montreal's historical Café Cléopâtre. Flickr user thehoneybunny, held under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

The case of Montreal is quite sensitive, though. The city is known for its low criminality rate, and even the Red Light was never a place to avoid (at least not since I’ve been here.) Local cabarets are a fixture of Montreal’s nightlife and sometime host events geared to a regular, although open-minded, public. What’s more, some historical buildings are now threatened by the redevelopment project, which causes the ire of some local residents and heritage activists. Although the changes will undoubtedly positive, many don’t want the Red Light to entirely disappear.

It is interesting to see how these cities are going through the same transformations, which reflect an overall shift in priorities as far as urbanism is concerned. I’m especially curious to see how city governments will help and follow the green and cultural movements.

Backyard chickens approved in Vancouver

Vancouver just made chickens legal in the city, according to an article published in the Globe and Mail today. This will allow urban residents to keep a coop in their backyard, just like in other north American cities such as Portland, Ore. and Seattle. But this is not good news to certain experts who say keeping chickens at home is actually unhealthy. The SPCA says it fears that residents might be seduced into buying chickens without actually knowing how to take care of them, and the British Columbia Poultry Association warns that this might actually raise the risk of spreading diseases such as the avian flu.

I’d be curious to know more about this and what having chickens in your backyard really implies.

A visit at one of Toronto’s most innovative greenhouses

Last week I was in Toronto to do some interviews for a project I’m doing on urban agriculture, and my interviewees referred me to a new innovative project called Artscape Wychwood Barns. I had a bit of time so I decided to go check it out.

The project is located in a residential district not very far from the downtown area, in the St. Clair and Christie neighbourhood. These former streetcar repair barns, which had been vacant and decrepit for decades, were retrofitted by the organization Artscape and turned into a community centre. The space opened last November and now hosts offices for arts, environmental and community organizations, housing for artists and a state-of-the-art greenhouse operated by The Stop Community Food Centre.

I met with greenhouse coordinator Lord Abbey and with garden and education worker Kristen Howe. Kristen gave me a tour of the greenhouse and I made a little Soundslides animation with the interview I did with her and the pictures I took.

Please forgive me for the poor sound quality (especially when the ventilation starts toward the end,) I hope to be able to buy a decent digital recorder soon.

Stay tuned as I’ll be posting more material that I collected during my trip, including an interview with the curators of the exhibition Carrot City.

The future of cars as seen by Al Gore and Mitchell Joachim

The New York Times published an op-ed piece written by Al Gore yesterday, in which he proposes a five-point plan that will allow the United States to produce 100 per cent of its electricity from energy-efficient sources within 10 years:

  • The government should offer incentive for the construction of renewable energy plants.
  • A new grid should be built to transport renewable energy from its production sites to cities.
  • The government should give incentive to automobile companies to switch their production to hybrid cars.
  • All buildings should be equipped with energy-efficient windows and lighting in order to stop pollution and reduce energy bills.
  • The government should put a price on carbon emissions and lead the way to replace the Kyoto treaty by a better one.

Gore says that these initiatives will also help improve the state of the economy.
I found the section on the automobile industry particularly interesting:

We should help America’s automobile industry (not only the Big Three but the innovative new startup companies as well) to convert quickly to plug-in hybrids that can run on the renewable electricity that will be available as the rest of this plan matures. In combination with the unified grid, a nationwide fleet of plug-in hybrids would also help to solve the problem of electricity storage. Think about it: with this sort of grid, cars could be charged during off-peak energy-use hours; during peak hours, when fewer cars are on the road, they could contribute their electricity back into the national grid.

This made me think of a profile of Mitchell Joachim, written by traffic expert Tom Vanderbilt, that I read in Wired’s October edition. Joachim is an architect who focuses on reducing the ecological footprint of cities.

Among the biggest sources of waste, he argues, is the automobile—not only in energy but in the space it occupies (cars, he notes, spend more than 90 per cent of the day parked.) For nearly a century, Joachim says, “cities have been designed around cars. Why not design a car around a city?” So he did just that. One of his concept vehicles, the City Car, was named to Time magazine’s Invention of the Year list in 2007.

His various cars would  be less machine than Facebook on wheels. Instead or rpm gauges, there’d be social networking software telling drivers where their friends are and how to get there. Nade from neoprene and other soft materials, cars would no longer suffer traffic-fouling fender benders, merely what he calls “gentle congestion”—picture a flock of urban sheep grazing against one other. Like Zipcar vehicles, the cars would be shared. They would “read” potholes and send warnings to nearby drivers and city repair crews. Urban parking would be eased by intelligent real-time supply and demand management, with people bidding remotely for available spots. Of course, there’d also be more spaces to begin with, since his cars could be folded and stacked like shopping carts. The average New York City block could handle 880 of the vehicles, he says.

Al Gore, meet Mitchell Joachim.

Source: The New York Times, Nov. 9, 2008
Wired, Oct. 2008

An eco-town for Afghanistan

The Afghan government wants to build an eco-town that will be home to three million people in the north of Kabul. The city, already baptized Deh Sabz, is being designed by the French firm Architecture Studio and will be financed by the Afghan government as well as independent developers. The project was born in response to the overpopulation problem faced by Kabul, where 80 per cent of the population lives in shantytowns, according to the firm. Ninety per cent of its energy needs will be provided by renewable energy sources.

Source: “Le gouvernement afghan étudie la construction d’une ville nouvelle écologique près de Kaboul,” Le Monde, Oct. 16.

Prince Charles loves new urbanism

Prince Charles loves traditional towns where you can walk to the supermarket and wander around little streets. He’s spreading that idea through his Foundation for the Built Environment, which works with residents to apply the principles of new urbanism in British communities and in third-world countries. The projects also aim at developing renewable energies in cities by installing windmills or solar panels, for example.

Source: “Le prince Charles veut exporter son modèle d’urbanisme ‘à l’ancienne,’” Le Monde, Oct. 25