Social networking for gardeners: the landsharing movement

This post was long overdue. I first heard about sharing backyards initiatives last year while reporting on the rise of urban agriculture. Since then, these initiatives have flourished and others have been created.

A community garden in St-Louis

Many North American city dwellers have the advantage of having a backyard adjacent to their house, and have been increasingly aware of the potential they have for food production. Gardening can be quite time-consuming though, and many of us aren’t ready to get our hands dirty. The solution: letting another garden-lover come over and take care of it all during the season, and pay him back in food or cash. The remaining produce should cover the expenses.

As usual in the post-internet world, garden owners and would-be workers can find each other online. SharedEarth offers a worldwide matching service listings and an interactive map. Most users are located in the U.S., but its fanbase is already slowly growing. Sharing Backyards, another online platform, is strongly rooted in Canada and the U.S.

At the local level, BK Farmyards takes care of Brooklyn gardens, while Urban Garden Share operates in Seattle.

Landsharing brings more to its adepts than food only. Through sharing, neighbourhood residents can reconnect and contribute to building vibrant communities. As summed up on BK Farmyards’ website:

The rituals of preparing and eating meals are the foundation of culture: it is how we celebrate the gift of life, and how trust is established in a community. BK Farmyard provides local jobs, local economic growth, and a sense of stewardship and pride in the community: it educates, organizes, and mobilizes new social relations around food.

But it’s not only about vegetables. Calgary resident Eliese Watson runs Apiaries and Bees for Communities, a business through which she tends to bee hives located in several gardens. In exchange, garden owers get their share of honey.

Posted in Urban agriculture | Leave a comment

Neo-education: the revolution of learning

“The first month of watching TED talks online gave me more knowledge, insight, and inspiration than all four years of the glorified status symbol that is Ivy League education,” writes Brain Pickings editor and TED addict Maria Popova in Good magazine’s Slow Issue. Popova goes on describing how neo-education (free education available on demand through online platforms) achieves what traditional education increasingly fails to do — satisfy our curiosity and provide us with endless knowledge.

I can certainly relate to that. Six years of academia gave me the many skills I need to be a social critic and journalist: observe, analyze, criticize, and produce meaningful content. As for knowledge, I’ve already forgotten most of it, to my greatest dismay. Academia, as far as the Liberal arts are concerned, is shaped on a model that is not valid anymore. Its raison d’être is not to give us knowledge but to train researchers — which few of us actually become.

The TED commandments.

The Internet gives me access to an infinite pool of knowledge. TED talks and podcasts (I learned so much through Radio Lab) are a blessing. Their skillful use of storytelling makes it easier for me to get interested and retain information. This might be why storytelling is making a big comeback (local versions of The Moth are popping up everywhere across the continent.) We’re craving for stories, for information that isn’t delivered in a dull and uninteresting way and elicits a whole range of emotions. We’re also craving for a more human way of transmitting knowledge, and going back to the oral tradition.

Social media has also transformed my learning. Through Twitter, I have access to the best thinkers and researchers in my field. I religiously read and ponder over Jay Rosen’s tweets. I have access to his ideas not only for free (no need to buy a book or pay for NYU tuition fees) but also in real time. The discussion and debate also take place instantly. This open, participative thinking process has the potential to revolutionize the world of academia.

Are we going toward a democratization of knowledge?

This man is dangerous.

Posted in Web technologies | Leave a comment

Finding the right city

As part of my research on cities and personality, I’ve just finished perusing Richard Florida’s Who’s Your City. Florida says we should look at different factors when searching for the right city to move in. One of them is personality.

This shouldn’t be a secret to anybody that certain cities offer different types of stimulation. For instance, the American coasts are reknown for being creative hubs. One can feel stimulated by the amount of art galleries and other cultural offerings, and the general atmosphere that encourages residents to create, launch their own companies, go to the museum, etc. In return, these residents will contribute to solidify this environment, which in turn will attract more creative people, etc.

Florida argues that, because of this cycle, American cities end up having a personality of their own. After doing some extensive research, he’s found that their personality pretty much matches the Big Five personality traits usually applied to people: openness to experience, conscientiousness, extroversion, agreeableness, neuroticism. Therefore when we move to a new place, we should be aware not only of our own personality type, but also of the city’s personality. (To determine your personality type, you can do this online test: http://www.outofservice.com/bigfive/)

The Big Five model has been criticized and rightfully so; it is difficult to put personalities into categories and draw conclusions from that. Yet I do think this was a useful tool for this study. The maps that Florida created are shockingly compelling!

Here’s what Florida says of people belonging to the openness category and what it means for cities:

Certain personality types seem to require higher and more intense levels of stimulation – both literally and figuratively. They are drawn to extreme experience – complex music, intense tastes, exciting places, and eccentric people. It’s not by chance that people with these qualities happen to cluster in highly stimulating places, I thought. They are inclined, if not programmed, to seek them out.

Openness to experience is the only personality type that plays a consistent role in regional economic development. It is highly correlated with jobs in computing, science, arts, design, and entertainment; with overall human capital levels, high-tech industry, income, and housing values.

Unfortunately, this research has been done for the U.S. only and no data is available for Canadian cities. But I think that in order to progress, I would have to determine:

  • Vancouver’s personality type
  • The flourishing industries in the region: do they belong to the creative industry?
  • What can we fear for the city if the film industry, the video games industry and the fine arts are threatened?
  • Why do so many young people leave Vancouver, and what personality types are they? Who are the personality types who choose to stay?

On top of being a fascinating read, Florida’s book made me realize so many things about myself. A lot of times I felt he was talking about me! This has led me to think about who I am and what I need to evolve as a person.

Let me know if you think of other areas I should explore based on Florida’s work. As usual, suggestions and comments are very welcome!

Vancouver, who are you? Credits: Flickr user s.yume. The caption for this picture reads: "A beautiful view of beautiful Vancouver BC from the seawall in Stanley Park. Vancouver is an amazingly idyllic place to be, beautiful all year round. How many times have I said beautiful? It really is my favorite city on Earth, I can't think of any place I'd rather live."

Posted in Research | 2 Comments

Cities, happiness and personality: a research manifesto

Dear readers,

I really tried to love Vancouver. I will not spend a great deal of time trying to convince you that I did, but I really did. The fact is, five months after moving here, I’m a shadow of my old self. I will not spend a great deal of time trying to explain to you what happened, all you need to know is that the city had a pretty hard way of showing me our personalities don’t match. I can’t wait to get the hell out.

I hold Vancouver personnally responsible for all of this. You see, I’m an over-confident, stubborn twentysomething French girl. I refuse to believe that one can go in a few months from “hyper-active young graduate about to conquer the world” to “I feel like I’m dying inside.” Especially when each time you leave the city, be it for one day, you suddenly get all jumpy and annoyingly energetic again.

I know this sounds weird, but think about it for a minute. If you’re Canadian, you know that anyone who’s spent some time in Vancouver either loves it or hates it. Loves it like “I’ve visited 30 countries and I wouldn’t live anywhere else,” hates it like “this place has no soul and is truly depressing.” Actually, Canadians have pretty strong feelings about every major city in the country. “Toronto totally sucks.” “Montreal is just sooooo awesooome.” There doesn’t seem to be any middle ground.

Now the people who hate Vancouver usually have a hard time explaining why it is so. Of course there’s the rain, lack of cultural events and nightlife, unappealing architecture, etc. But then they always end up adding something like “there’s just something to it.” Or, “it’s the vibe, I don’t dig it.” And eventually they conclude with “I don’t know what it is, but it’s just depressing.”

I’ve been trying to convince myself that maaaaybe the summer will reveal the city’s hidden treasures, feeling guilty to not be content with what I have. But the truth is, my mind was made up after a few days only. I remember the first time I walked on Commercial Drive. It didn’t take long before I thought “I don’t know what it is, but this street has something weird to it.” I didn’t feel comfortable at all. Nowhere in the city did I have the same sense of wonderment that Montreal elicited in me.

Where did that feeling come from? What is that “thing” about Vancouver that nobody seems to be able to explain? What happens in the brief moment during which we discover a new place that makes us decide whether we’re comfortable or not? I won’t take “gut feeling” for an answer. I shall discover what happens in our brain when we visit a city for the first time, how cities and places can affect our personality, and why we love or hate our cities so passionately. This will be an exciting trip into the fields of environmental psychology, urban sociology, psychogeography and more.

I’ve also decided to regularly give an account of the state of my research in this blog. Posts will be classified in the category “research.” You are encouraged to participate by submitting your ideas and hypotheses as well as by giving your opinion and advice.

Wish me well!

Flavie

Posted in Architecture, Research, Urbanism | 2 Comments

Direct Trade: coffee at its best

Defiant Imagination is back! After a months-long hiatus, due in part to an international sporting event that took place in Vancouver last month. I hope to be able to write here regularly again.

Customers can get their coffee brewed with siphon machines at Café Myriade.

A little bit of self-promotion: my article on Direct Trade was published in The Warehouse. High-end coffee was just beginning to reach the East Coast when I left Montreal, and I find it definitely easier to have access to good coffee in Vancouver. What a blessing! I will always remember the hour I spent with Jean-François Leduc, owner of Montreal’s Caffè in Gamba. “Isn’t this macchiato delicious!” he exclaimed, after force-feeding me the third cup of dark mixture. (I spent the most energetic hours of my life after this.) Indeed it was, and I have since then been accustomed to this creamy and salty taste.

I’m glad North America is discovering quality coffee. These huge cups of tasteless “sock juce,” as we call it in France, served in non-reusable cardboard cups, are nonsense. Coffee should be savoured during a good conversation with a good friend, or while looking at passers-by, or while reading a good book. Coffee gives you the opportunity to sit back, take a break for a few minutes and enjoy your surroundings. So here’s my article:

It’s early in the afternoon and I’m enjoying one of the last warm days of September, sitting on the terrace of Café Myriade. I’m savouring a cup of thick, black Tanzanian coffee that the barista recommended for the brewing technique I selected.

Read More »

Posted in Food | Leave a comment

Urban revitalization: when retail giants lead the way

Please excuse me for the lack of posts in the last few weeks. I’ve been busy preparing my move to Vancouver and slowly adjusting to my new life here. I hope to be able to write about all the good stuff happening in the city and hopefully visit other west coast cities such as Portland and Seattle.

This week, I’ve been looking at how chain stores can participate in urban revitalization. While doing some research for an article, I stumbled upon this 2005 Seattle Times article. American Apparel had just opened its first Seattle store in an area that was trying to take on a new lease of life, and hoped their presence would attract other boutiques. The article described their strategy:

While scouting locations for American Apparel stores, Webb looks for signs that speak to a hippay sensibility. Literal signs, such as “Loft Available” or “Vegetarian Restaurant.”

In a few instances, American Apparel is an active player in bringing other retailers to a street, leasing more space than it needs and subletting to those that cater to the same demographic.

In Houston, a city of malls, American Apparel opted to open downtown, where fashion boutiques do not exist, and is negotiating for a location in downtown San Jose, Calif. Yes, San Jose has a downtown.

And in Portland, American Apparel opened a store 18 months ago among boarded-up buildings on Southwest Stark Street instead of in the nearby Pearl District, where trendy redevelopment already had taken hold.

(By the way, did anybody stick with the term “hippay”?)

I never thought of urban revitalization as a conscious process, especially not operated by retail giants. Most of the time, revitalization happens progressively when store owners and artists look for cheap retail spaces and studios. But I incidentally found a similar example of this.

Lara Swimmer

Urban Outfitters

Urban Outfitter’s new headquarters are housed in a huge five-building, 11-acre campus located in the Philadelphia Navy Yard. The building houses offices for the company’s different brands (Urban Outfitters, Free People, Anthropologie and Terrain) as well as employee services: a cafeteria, a coffee bar, a library and a fitness centre. The clothing and houseware company undertook the redevelopment of this former shipbuilding complex in 2004. The revamped buidings are a wonderful example of adaptation of turn-of-the-century industrial archictecture to contemporary purposes.

This great article from Metropolis magazine sums up pretty well the change this represented for the company:

The idea of yanking more than 600 of Philadelphia’s most creative—not to mention best-dressed —workers out of downtown was the equivalent of exiling Manhattan’s Seventh Avenue fashion houses to an industrial park near JFK. Losing so many trendsetters would surely diminish the Center City District’s hard-won cool quotient. Meanwhile all those hipsters in skinny jeans and vintage boots would have to figure out how to get to a compound so far off the city grid it was practically tumbling into the Delaware River. There wasn’t a coffeehouse or magazine stand in sight.

Other businesses have since relocated to the Navy Yard, creating more than 4,000 jobs and participating in the rebirth of South Philadelphia.

See more pictures on Decor8′s Flickr photostream.

Posted in Architecture, Urbanism | Leave a comment

Charter cities: using urbanization to boost development

Economist Paul Romer has an interesting take on getting third-world countries out of poverty. His idea: to build “charter cities” operated under an independent jurisdiction, just like Hong Kong used to be. Think Canada taking over Guantánamo Bay for a while to oversee its development. Romer’s plan might be ambitious and extravagant, but it has nonetheless been generating a great deal of interest.

Read a Q&A with Romer on the New York Times’ Freakonomics blog.

Visit the project’s website.

Watch Romer’s TED talk:

Posted in Business and Economics, Urbanism | Leave a comment

Urban chickens: not always a pleasant affair

Raising chickens in Vancouver became legal more than six months ago, but the issue is still subject to much gossip.

The Globe and Mail’s Gary Mason had a humorous column in the paper yesterday that brought to light some of the lesser-known aspect of poultry-raising.

I also wonder how the lawyer-by-day/chicken-owner-by-night is going to handle certain situations. Like when an egg gets stuck coming out. It happens, not infrequently. And when it does, you have to stick your hand in there and get it.

It’s also not uncommon for a hen’s vents to collapse. A vent is the external opening at the bottom of the bird’s vaginal canal. To fix the problem, you’re supposed to moisten your fingers (hemorrhoid cream is the lubricant of choice) and move the vent back into place. I can see hockey dads and soccer moms throughout the city just dying to snap on the rubber gloves to perform that little procedure.

More realistically, I imagine the offices of veterinarians being overrun with city folk having chicken problems. Urban dwellers and their children are going to become attached to these creatures. When the little birds are feeling under the weather, Vancouverites will spend thousands to get the problem diagnosed.

Urban farming might be trendy, but it’s still farming, and therefore not always glamorous. On the other hand, going chicken-feeding at my grandparents’ farm was one of the greatest and funniest activities I could think of as a little girl. Being awaken by the rooster at 6a.m., however, was not (but roosters are forbidden in Vancouver.)

British company Omlet sells cute and practical chicken coops for the urban poultry.

British company Omlet sells cute and practical chicken coops for the urban poultry. www.omlet.co.uk

Posted in Urban agriculture | 1 Comment

From red light to green living

Pittsburgh is currently in the spotlight for hosting the G20 summit, and the changes it has undergone in the past years are finally getting some visibility. The steel city has abandoned its industrial past and embraced a diversified economy. But what drew my attention was a mention about its urban redevelopment in The Economist.

The David L. Lawrence Convention Center is, according to the article, the world’s first and largest LEED-certified convention centre. It is located in an area that used to be filled with sex shops, adult theatres and prostitutes. The centre is part of the Pittsburgh Cultural District, a redevelopment effort that seeks to transform this so-called redlight district into a cultural hub. The district also includes several theatres and cultural centres as well as the High School for Creative and Performing Arts.

The Agnes R. Katz Plaza. Photo courtesy of the Pittsburgh Cultural Trust.

Pittsburgh's Agnes R. Katz Plaza. Photo courtesy of the Pittsburgh Cultural Trust.

“The Cultural District today attracts over 2,000,000 visitors annually generating an estimated economic impact of $303 million,” boasts its website.

Pittsburgh is not the only city having gone through the effort of getting rid of its embarrassing debauchery-oriented areas. Amsterdam’s legendary red-light district is opening its prostitute booths to local designers. Montreal, where I currently live, has recently tackled on the e of its own “Red Light.” Located at a major intersection close to downtown, the area will be home to green buildings and cultural organizations.

Montreal's historical Café Cléopâtre. Flickr user thehoneybunny, held under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

Montreal's historical Café Cléopâtre. Flickr user thehoneybunny, held under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives license.

The case of Montreal is quite sensitive, though. The city is known for its low criminality rate, and even the Red Light was never a place to avoid (at least not since I’ve been here.) Local cabarets are a fixture of Montreal’s nightlife and sometime host events geared to a regular, although open-minded, public. What’s more, some historical buildings are now threatened by the redevelopment project, which causes the ire of some local residents and heritage activists. Although the changes will undoubtedly positive, many don’t want the Red Light to entirely disappear.

It is interesting to see how these cities are going through the same transformations, which reflect an overall shift in priorities as far as urbanism is concerned. I’m especially curious to see how city governments will help and follow the green and cultural movements.

Posted in Urbanism | Leave a comment

On giving

One of my last readings was Dambisa Moyo’s provocative essay Dead Aid. While I don’t feel qualified and knowledgeable enough to take a definitive position concerning the debate between international aid proponents and its detractors, I do feel that something has gone wrong in the relationship between developed and third-world countries.

The situation of depDead Aidendence of third-world countries on foreign aid has been going on for far too long to remain healthy, and it has been leading to abuse in many cases (the example of the mosquito net, used several times by Moyo, is a good one. Mosquito nets manufactured by rich countries are then sent to poor ones out of good will, even though poor countries would gain more from manufacturing the nets themselves thanks to foreign investment.)

Reading Moyo’s essay has brought me to think about altruism and the act of giving. One thing I’ve learned from my trips to developing countries is that I had much more to learn and receive from the local population than the opposite. The reasons that motivated my trips had to do with a feeling of collective guilt that we try to address through aid. I do not wish to be in that position ever again, since I’ve come to think that it does more harm than good. What I’d now like to concentrate on, as far as international cooperation is concerned, is to foster mutual understanding and learning.

As for giving, I believe that many issues still need to be taken care of around me, even if I live in one of the richest parts of the world. I’ve thereby come up with a list of innovative ways to make good use of your money. Rule n°1: know where your money is going.

  • Don’t focus on the material stuff only Journalism might be going through what might be its biggest crisis ever, but there will always be a need for reporting. Spot.Us gets readers directly involved in the editing process by allowing them to choose and fund the stories that they think are worth writing about. The website started out in the Bay Area and is now providing the same services for Los Angeles. If it works, this model could be brought to many other communities.
  • Be picky With the growing success of crowdsourcing and crowdfunding, we’re going to start seeing more and more online platforms that will facilitate the making of ideas and projects. Kickstarter acts as a fundraising platform for creatives who have a specific project in mind. For example, artists, photographers, filmmakers or writers can get help for their next book, film, or endeavour. Projects only receive fuding when the target amount has been reached, although this amount can go beyond expectations. In return, donors get involved in the creative process by staying updated and receiving little perks. A relationship can therefore be initiated between donors and receivers. Firstgiving is based on the same principles, but concentrates on charitable initiatives. Individuals can create a personal profile and raise money for the nonprofit of their choice. These platforms allow for donors to choose which project, among hundreds, suits them best.
  • Be original If you have a lot (and I mean, a lot) of spare change you’re willing to give away for a good cause, the Globe and Mail can show you how . Their weekly column Giving Back, published each Saturday, features original ways of donating or raising cash. A soccer camp for kids with cancer, a community association, a specific research area, a student in need of a scholarship are example of recipients. Donations can amount to several thousand dollars.
  • Invest in entrepreneurship I don’t want to rule out financial aid to developing countries entirely, as there are several kinds of initiatives I believe in. Microcredit is one of them, even though its efficiency is still subject to debate. Kiva acts as an intermediary between lenders and entrepreneurs in need of a boost for their business. Because you’re lending the money and expect to receive interests in return, receivers can keep a sense of pride that is lost in the traditional aid process.

As for me, I give a little bit each year to WBEZ Chicago Public Radio and WNYC New York Public Radio for my two favourite radio shows, This American Life and Radio Lab.

Posted in Business and Economics | Leave a comment